Map search intent and budget waste
We review campaign structure, keyword logic, search terms, landing alignment, and signal quality.
We restructure campaigns, clean up tracking, and scale what actually drives qualified pipeline.
Typical Lift
0x ROAS
Cleaner account structure and sharper intent control.
Lead Quality
$0 CPA
Lower acquisition cost without flooding the pipeline.
Growth Dashboard
LiveOne visual layer for spend, attributed revenue, and lead quality.
Spend Managed
$82K
Search + PMax mix
Revenue Attributed
$347K
4.2x blended ROAS
Lead Efficiency
$52 CPA
Tracked to CRM quality
CTR
7.8%
Higher intent traffic
Connected Platforms
Execution Pipeline
We review campaign structure, keyword logic, search terms, landing alignment, and signal quality.
Search, PMax, brand, and remarketing get clear jobs so optimization becomes less noisy.
We scale only after the conversion signal, page experience, and economics start matching.
Once clean data is flowing, we optimize search terms, bidding pressure, and post-click friction before forcing more scale.
That is the difference between chasing spend and controlling revenue with precision.
Before vs After
Before Analytix9
Overspend, weak tracking, broad traffic
After Analytix9
Sharper intent, cleaner signal, stronger revenue fit
ROI / Growth Calculator
Estimated Clicks
0
Estimated Leads
0
Potential Revenue
$0
Projected ROAS
0x
Results Section
Challenge
Rebuilt search around intent tiers and offline-quality feedback.
Result
42% better SQL rate
42% better SQL rate with lower CPA.
How Analytix9 helped a fintech brand improve measurement accuracy and acquisition efficiency.
Read case study arrow_forwardA digital marketing agency case study focused on pipeline visibility and paid performance in real estate.
Read case study arrow_forwardHow a retail brand improved ROAS with better feed strategy, channel alignment, and measurement.
Read case study arrow_forwardTrust Layer
Teams trust Analytix9 because we keep the work clear, explain the numbers properly, and focus on results that actually matter to the business.
Analytix9 Growth Team
Dedicated strategists & analysts
Client Reviews
Specific feedback from operators who needed cleaner attribution, stronger lead quality, and a more reliable scaling story.
star star star star star“Analytix9 turned Google Ads from a reporting headache into a revenue lever we could finally trust.”
RSverified VerifiedRitika S.
Growth Lead, LuxeCart
FAQ
Yes. We manage Google Ads for lead generation, ecommerce, and hybrid businesses. The account structure, reporting model, landing-page logic, and optimization targets are adapted to the commercial goal instead of forcing every account into the same playbook.
Yes. We review landing-page fit, conversion-path friction, GA4 and GTM setup, enhanced conversions, and CRM or offline lead signals because Google Ads usually underperforms when the post-click and measurement layers are weak.
That depends on budget size, search volume, conversion quality, and how messy the account is today. In many accounts we can identify waste quickly, but stronger and more stable performance improvements usually come after the structure, tracking, and landing experience have had time to feed cleaner signals back into the account.
We do not treat Google Ads as an isolated media-buying task. Analytix9 looks at campaign structure, search intent, landing-page alignment, CRM feedback, and reporting confidence together so the budget decisions are tied to real business outcomes rather than just top-level platform metrics.
Yes. We often start with an audit of the existing account, then decide what should be repaired, what should be rebuilt, and what should be preserved. Some accounts need a full restructure, while others only need cleaner conversion logic and tighter campaign roles.
Yes. Lower CPC is not useful if the traffic is weaker. We focus on qualified leads, revenue efficiency, and pipeline quality so the account gets better at attracting the right demand instead of just more traffic.
Google Ads Performance Engine
Search-led demand engine